For many years there seemed to be a single efficient option to keep information on your computer – by using a hard disk drive (HDD). Nonetheless, this type of technology is actually expressing its age – hard disks are actually loud and slow; they are power–ravenous and are likely to produce quite a lot of warmth for the duration of intensive procedures.

SSD drives, on the contrary, are swift, consume a lesser amount of power and are much cooler. They feature a new method of file accessibility and storage and are years in front of HDDs with regards to file read/write speed, I/O operation as well as power effectivity. Observe how HDDs fare up against the modern SSD drives.

1. Access Time

Image

SSD drives offer a completely new & revolutionary approach to data safe–keeping according to the usage of electronic interfaces rather than any kind of moving components and spinning disks. This completely new technology is considerably faster, making it possible for a 0.1 millisecond file access time.

Image

The concept powering HDD drives dates back to 1954. And even while it’s been noticeably processed in recent times, it’s still no match for the inventive technology powering SSD drives. Through today’s HDD drives, the best data file access rate you’re able to attain can vary in between 5 and 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

Image

Due to the very same radical solution that allows for better access times, you may as well benefit from better I/O performance with SSD drives. They can accomplish twice as many operations within a specific time compared to an HDD drive.

An SSD can manage at the least 6000 IO’s per second.

Image

All through the exact same lab tests, the HDD drives proved to be significantly slower, with only 400 IO operations managed per second. While this might appear to be a good deal, for people with an overloaded web server that serves loads of sought after sites, a sluggish hard drive can cause slow–loading web sites.

3. Reliability

Image

SSD drives lack just about any moving elements, meaning that there is a lot less machinery inside them. And the less literally moving parts you’ll find, the lower the possibilities of failing are going to be.

The typical rate of failing of any SSD drive is 0.5%.

Image

HDD drives use rotating hard disks for keeping and browsing data – a concept going back to the 1950s. And with disks magnetically hanging in the air, rotating at 7200 rpm, the prospect of one thing going wrong are generally bigger.

The common rate of failure of HDD drives can vary between 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

Image

SSDs don’t have moving parts and need hardly any cooling energy. In addition, they demand a small amount of energy to work – lab tests have shown that they’ll be operated by a regular AA battery.

In general, SSDs use up amongst 2 and 5 watts.

Image

HDD drives are renowned for staying noisy. They require extra electricity for cooling down reasons. Within a hosting server that has a number of HDDs running all the time, you need a lot of fans to keep them cool – this may cause them a lot less energy–economical than SSD drives.

HDDs use up somewhere between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

Image

SSD drives allow for better file access rates, that, subsequently, permit the CPU to complete data calls faster and afterwards to go back to other tasks.

The regular I/O wait for SSD drives is simply 1%.

Image

HDD drives accommodate reduced access rates in comparison with SSDs do, which will result in the CPU required to hold out, whilst scheduling resources for your HDD to discover and return the inquired file.

The standard I/O wait for HDD drives is around 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

Image

It’s about time for some real–world cases. We, at Eyoola, competed a complete system backup on a server only using SSDs for file storage uses. In that procedure, the regular service time for an I/O request stayed under 20 ms.

Image

All through the identical trials with the same hosting server, now suited out with HDDs, overall performance was much sluggish. Throughout the server back–up process, the typical service time for any I/O calls ranged somewhere between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

Image

Referring to back–ups and SSDs – we’ve spotted a great enhancement with the back–up rate since we moved to SSDs. Today, a normal hosting server data backup will take merely 6 hours.

Image

We applied HDDs mainly for a few years and we’ve excellent comprehension of how an HDD functions. Generating a backup for a web server furnished with HDD drives is going to take about 20 to 24 hours.

Should you wish to quickly add to the overall performance of your sites without having to alter any code, an SSD–equipped website hosting service is a great option. Check our hosting packages packages plus the VPS hosting packages – these hosting solutions highlight fast SSD drives and are offered at the best prices.

  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • Our Virtual Private Servers provide no setup service fees and work in a reliable network delivering 99.9% of uptime. Full SSH/full root access warranted.

  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Take a look at our pricing and select the best Virtual Private Server for your active websites. You can easily upgrade to a more powerful VPS Hosting package with simply a click.
  • Compare our hosting plans

  • Contact Us

  •  
  • Our representatives are available for you 24x7 to answer all questions concerning our VPS Hosting platform. 1–hour response time frame warranty.